Domestically, China’s government uses the term “rational” to legitimise policy decisions as scientific, modern and the most appropriate choice to address a given policy issue, whereas contestation is often described as irrational, misguided or instigated by a small minority of trouble-makers or external instigators.
In international relations, “rational” often appears alongside “pragmatic” and “constructive,” conveying the message that counterparts should focus on shared benefits and constructive cooperation. For European governments, this term carries an expectation to prioritize economic interests and independence from the U.S as part of “true strategic autonomy”. This requires setting aside disagreements on issues ranging from human rights and China’s stance on Ukraine to overcapacity and technology related security-concerns.
Towards Global South countries, China calls for working together for a fair, equal and rational international order, that reflects the rising weight of emerging economies. At the same time, they are asked to refrain from siding with the US. The underlying message to all: opposing China is not rational, given its political clout and the economic benefits it offers.
